![]() |
ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - Printable Version +- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum) +-- Forum: ispCP Omega Development Area (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Announcements (/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 (/thread-7555.html) |
RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - RatS - 08-20-2009 05:38 PM nothing changed for 1.0.1/1.0.2 RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - grg - 08-20-2009 05:50 PM Thankyou, i've just noticed that the guide has been updated. wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ispcp/ispcp-omega-1.0.2.tar.bz2 -> it seems this file doesn't exist RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - gOOvER - 08-20-2009 06:08 PM Please wait. RatS makes the Releasepackages at this Moment. RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - BioALIEN - 08-20-2009 08:24 PM @gOOvER, I lack a lot of permissions to carry out my job properly. I still rely on an admin to do the publishing ![]() This is why I started work on the new site but that's all now up to ephi to decide. RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - gOOvER - 08-20-2009 08:30 PM @Malte, now it's your turn. Give permissions to BioAlien ![]() RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - monotek - 08-20-2009 08:36 PM Why are version 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 not reflected in the trac roadmap and the mainsite? And why do you only fix the squirrelmail stuff? Imho this was a good possibility to add the other fixes to the package to, by renaming 1.1 ind 1.0.1 but keep the ssl stuff for 1.1. RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - gOOvER - 08-20-2009 08:41 PM (08-20-2009 08:36 PM)monotek Wrote: Why are version 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 not reflected in the trac roadmap and the mainsite? Because, this is only a SECURITY FIX. And why should it reflected in the Roadmap? If you want the new things, install a nightly and help testing ![]() RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - simple - 08-20-2009 09:33 PM It's pretty bad style to announce a new version, link the files from the website and not having them on Sourceforge for real ![]() RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - joximu - 08-20-2009 09:47 PM Please guys - its maybe not the perfect style... we know it. We have to find the best way for the further development, and best means not only for the user (ispcp-admins) but also for the developers. This was a quick shot because of the importance of the bug in the webmail - and obviously it was not tested enough. We learn and try to improve. So please help us to improve and do not just commant that this was not good. /J RE: ispCP Omega 1.0.2 - RatS - 08-20-2009 10:01 PM (08-20-2009 09:33 PM)simple Wrote: It's pretty bad style to announce a new version, link the files from the website and not having them on Sourceforge for real They HAVE been online, but they are broken ... should I let ppl flood the board with support messages "Help ispCP 1.0.2 does not work"? |