![]() |
manual DNS control question - Printable Version +- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum) +-- Forum: ispCP Omega Support Area (/forum-30.html) +--- Forum: System Setup & Installation (/forum-32.html) +--- Thread: manual DNS control question (/thread-12256.html) |
manual DNS control question - kingxerxes - 11-27-2010 02:04 AM Hi There, I have just installed 1.0.7 and have a query about manual DNS control. New domains are created fine and are given the correct MX records that are specified in the template. The problem is that if i add a a custom MX record, it does not override the existing one, rather it creates duplicates. For example: 10 mail.myserver.com [custom] 10 mail.domain.com [from template] 15 mail2.domain.com [from template] I could just give my custom MX record a higher priority, but i know from experience that mail is often delivered to secondary or tertiary servers in any case, so this would not work. I have the same problem with A records. For example, i would like to host a domain on ispcp and use the email features, but want to host the website elsewhere (because it is ASP). I can create a manual DNS A record for WWW and the other server IP, but i am still left with the one created from the template. thanks for the help! RE: manual DNS control question - motokochan - 12-02-2010 02:43 AM You'll need to edit the templates used to generate the zone data. Do you want this for all domains, or just select ones? RE: manual DNS control question - kingxerxes - 12-02-2010 03:59 AM i just want to do it for one, or two, domains. the majority of the domains i host use the built in mail and web features, but some host them elsewhere. thanks! RE: manual DNS control question - motokochan - 12-03-2010 03:42 AM Hmm. That will likely be a bit more difficult as the way the software operates, it uses the same template for every domain. If I get a chance, I'll look into some possible ways to do this. RE: manual DNS control question - RatS - 12-03-2010 04:28 AM We still have an open ticket for this. This was never fully implemented. |