mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - Printable Version +- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum) +-- Forum: ispCP Omega Development Area (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General discussion (/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid (/thread-4995.html) |
mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - sci2tech - 11-23-2008 08:41 PM Right now we support both fcgid module for apache with mod_fastcgi being default. In Debian repository mod_fastcgi is in non-free and has 3 open bugs (from witch 1 is marked as important, 1 closed and 1 marked as wishlist). mod_fcgid has 5 open bugs (from witch 3 are marked as important, 1 normal and 1 marked as wishlist). Mod_fastcgi seems to be a little faster, but mod_fcgid more stable. Also mod_fcgid seems to consume less memory. For CentOS I could not found a working package for mod_fastcgi (but I`m not familiar with CentOS repos). My question is: Which should be default? Do you know other arguments? RE: mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - BeNe - 11-24-2008 04:17 AM I switched for some weeks over to mod_fcgid and the problem with dead php-process is gone. And i have more free ram. So at the moment i vote for fcgid. Greez BeNe RE: mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - RatS - 11-25-2008 03:23 AM I'm fine with changing, if it's possible without big impact on system/ispcp update. RE: mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - grg - 12-05-2008 11:16 PM X BeNe I'm still having the problem of dead processes and in the docs i can read that fastcgi and fcgid have this problem. Any idea? RE: mod_fastcgi vs mod_fcgid - sci2tech - 12-06-2008 01:58 AM I`m sure that you have php 5.2.0. Update to last php version and everything will work. And please do not take over to this (any) thread. Open a new one. |