+- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum)
+-- Forum: ispCP Omega Development Area (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: General discussion (/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: ispCP vs cPanel (/thread-517.html)
ispCP vs cPanel - BioALIEN - 05-11-2007 06:16 AM
This thread is a comparison between ispCP and cPanel. Please lets keep it unbiased and informative. Factual information only. refrain from posting about who sucks or who doesn't. Your opinion is appreciated, but give a full and valid breakdown of what, why, how.
I will start the thread by comparing our predecessor VHCS with cPanel and we can take it from here as a starting point:
http://www.guru-host.com/en/articles/cpanel-vs-vhcs.php
The final outcome of this thread will help us outline the comparison tables of ispCP vs other panels on this website.
RE: ispCP vs cPanel - gnif - 05-12-2007 12:52 AM
ispCP uses your systems packages where cPanel compiles its own versions.
cPanel does not use standard system locations for applications.
cPanel does not work with Debian (believe me, I have tried)
cPanel is expensive, ispCP is free.
ispCP gets it's bugs fixed.
cPanel supports SSL out of the box, ispCP doesn't (I am fixing this
)There is more, but I cant think of any at the moment.
RE: ispCP vs cPanel - raphael - 05-12-2007 04:48 AM
gnif Wrote:.I've tried too... and not even the tech support could get it working under woody! (you can guess that sarge was a no-no and etch... a definitive no)
cPanel does not work with Debian (believe me, I have tried)