+- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum)
+-- Forum: ispCP Omega Contributions Area (/forum-40.html)
+--- Forum: Enhancements (/forum-43.html)
+--- Thread: New ispCP Software Installer *RC1* (/thread-7463.html)
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - sci2tech - 09-20-2009 05:01 AM
(09-20-2009 05:00 AM)abuhome Wrote: Is this a new feature in ispcp 1.0.3 or an enhancment from fisa4 ?V1.0.3
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - TheCry - 09-24-2009 12:25 AM
Hi kilburn,
i have opened a ticket (http://www.isp-control.net/ispcp/ticket/2005).
I attached the patches, sql and images.
If you have any questions you know where you can find me..
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - Nuxwin - 09-24-2009 07:12 PM
@kilburn
I've look your comment in the dedicated ticket. Trunk is not frozen. You can integrat it if you want
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - RatS - 09-24-2009 11:34 PM
NOK, please don't merge it to trunk now. It's none of the dedicated 1.1.0 features... We must stick to the Roadmap.
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - Nuxwin - 09-24-2009 11:46 PM
(09-24-2009 11:34 PM)RatS Wrote: NOK, please don't merge it to trunk now. It's none of the dedicated 1.1.0 features... We must stick to the Roadmap.
Sorry, I said that because the ticket was found in the milestone 1.1. So much for me ...
Benedikt Just asking, why do you slow development?
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - RatS - 09-25-2009 12:05 AM
(09-24-2009 11:46 PM)nuxwin Wrote: Sorry, I said that because the ticket was found in the milestone 1.1. So much for me ...Thanks, it should not be there.
(09-24-2009 11:46 PM)nuxwin Wrote: Benedikt Just asking, why do you slow development?The community is requesting a stable and working software with regularly updates. Therefore, we should try to keep a high level of code security and test our features well. On the other hand are strict Milestones not a slower but a faster development. We are able to release more often. To put to many things into one milestone (see 1.1.0) avoids its closure.
I think this is enough for a public section. If you have any questions, please come back to me in a private talk.
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - gOOvER - 09-25-2009 12:35 AM
Not agree with you RatS. Then add it to the Roadmap. TheCry had a lot work with this and he can't make for every commit a Patch. In my opinion it doesn't matter if we have one or two Features. The SSL thing can only use 10% of the Users.
I'm agree with Nuxwin. With this you slow down. Come on RatS, let decide the Community and not only you alone
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - RatS - 09-25-2009 12:41 AM
(09-25-2009 12:35 AM)gOOvER Wrote: I'm agree with Nuxwin. With this you slow down. Come on RatS, let decide the Community and not only you alone
I did, gOOvER, I always do. Please check the results: http://www.isp-control.net/forum/thread-5456.html
Development has to do with continuity, too. If I come now up with: Let's ask what the community wants today, what about the lot of work, sci2tech put in the SSL implementation?
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - xister - 09-25-2009 01:18 AM
Domain Management = is ready for 1.0.3
SSL Implementation = should be ready for 1.1
The Software Installer is running very well, why not integrate SSL and the Software Installer. The feature poll is for new developments. The Installer is ready and tested. Its the same with the domain managemend. it comes out of the community and everyone is happy with it.
RE: New ispCP Software Installer *BETA* - Nuxwin - 09-25-2009 01:31 AM
(09-25-2009 01:18 AM)xister Wrote: Domain Management = is ready for 1.0.3
SSL Implementation = should be ready for 1.1
The Software Installer is running very well, why not integrate SSL and the Software Installer. The feature poll is for new developments. The Installer is ready and tested. Its the same with the domain managemend. it comes out of the community and everyone is happy with it.
Domain ? (??? DNS ???) Management = is ready for 1.0.3 ( With lots of bugs ....)
SSL Implementation = should be ready for 1.1 ---> sure ?
For the installer, it's should be tested, validated by ispCP dev team (for security reasons) and after, planned by PM).