![]() |
autoresponder loop - Printable Version +- ispCP - Board - Support (http://www.isp-control.net/forum) +-- Forum: ispCP Omega Support Area (/forum-30.html) +--- Forum: Usage (/forum-34.html) +--- Thread: autoresponder loop (/thread-9259.html) |
autoresponder loop - ramires - 01-19-2010 12:50 AM I have problem with autoresponder. When i set a autoresponder if other side have a autoresponder too my e-mail folder gets tons of messages. How could i set limit on autoresponder messages?[/align] RE: autoresponder loop - rbtux - 01-19-2010 12:51 AM use a sane autoresponer.... RE: autoresponder loop - kilburn - 01-19-2010 01:03 AM Ispcp's autoresponder could by improved by logging the responded messages and avoiding multiple replies to the same sender within a time-frame, something that it's not doing right now. Nevertheless, it injects an "X-Autoreply" header that should be detected by the other autoresponder, and looks for a similar headers on received e-mails precisely to avoid such loops. Therefore, I would say the the autoresponder on the other end is actually behaving even poorer than ispcp's one. If the other end has a reasonable autorepsponder, this situation will simply not happen. Concretely, if you send from an autoreply-enabled address in an ispcp system to another autoreply-enabled address in another ispcp system, no loops will happen. Obviously, we would be glad if you actually improve the current situation and contribute the resulting code! RE: autoresponder loop - rbtux - 01-19-2010 01:07 AM what is really missing is an answer interval (do not send message to the same recipient for x days... a minimum of 1 should be mandatory...) RE: autoresponder loop - kilburn - 01-19-2010 01:18 AM (01-19-2010 01:07 AM)rbtux Wrote: what is really missing is an answer interval (do not send message to the same recipient for x days... a minimum of 1 should be mandatory...) kilburn Wrote:Ispcp's autoresponder could by improved by logging the responded messages and avoiding multiple replies to the same sender within a time-frame, something that it's not doing right now. So... we're saying the same thing ![]() RE: autoresponder loop - rbtux - 01-19-2010 01:48 AM sry I somehow overread that ;-)) yeah we are saying the same thing then ;-) RE: autoresponder loop - ramires - 01-20-2010 06:27 PM Actually my perl scripting not enogh to add time interval to the code. Also I found some autoresponders but ıt's risky to setup in a customer servers. Ok then waiting a perl hero... |