Help us improve the navigation of ISPCP

[suw]

i find version 1 clear and better than version 2.
Icons and text on the same collumn looks like a mess.

[juanper]

My vote is for the second option.

Great work congratulations

[ibiza4000]

my vote us for navigation2, navigation2 much much better !!

[eplay]

navigation2 is better
Now it has published only quickly, before IPv6 starts. This is supposed to be already in about 10 days.

[UncleSam]

Navigation 2 is much better than Navigation 1!

[rethus]

An additional Wish for Navigation 2:
If the Navigation hae some subnavigation, the background of the subnavigation should be colord a little lighter than the rest of the menubar.
In such way, its much more usable, cause you can see with only one look, which navigation-part is actualy choosed.

[dragon001]

Why don't you integrate both?
And make an Setting to choose from

[UncleSam]

(01-25-2011 07:55 PM)dragon001 Wrote:  Why don't you integrate both?
And make an Setting to choose from

If they integrate both they also have to update both in further versions.
Only having one template is much easier and they can focus on developing only one.

[dragon001]

(01-25-2011 10:43 PM)UncleSam Wrote:  

(01-25-2011 07:55 PM)dragon001 Wrote:  Why don't you integrate both?
And make an Setting to choose from

If they integrate both they also have to update both in further versions.
Only having one template is much easier and they can focus on developing only one.

I don't aggree on this one.

The menu can be built dynamicly.
You basicly only need a dataset.

The sub-templates decide how the page should look like.
(The Top Menu only runs through the Mainlevel)
The Sublevel is displayed (only the active level)

On the other hand you just use a treemenue with the active element.

[Heart]

Definitly option 2