Manual lines in DNS zone file

[kilburn]

sci2tech Wrote:I did not included in RC7 because things can be easy broken by clients that do not know what DNS is

If this is the real reason I suggest adding a configuration option (allow manual dns setup) disabled by default. Otherwise this patch will surely break sooner or later and may cause upgrade problems to people that use it, etc.

I can implement it if you agree with my suggestion sci2tech, just give me an "ok, do it!"

[sci2tech]

Blondak already added this functionality . Still I think this should not be used until it will be "fool proof" (no offence to anybody). Please test it and feel free to add improvements. If more people will test it and offer feedback, this can be merged into trunk.

[Mister_K]

for install in rc7 its possible ? i want plz

[sci2tech]

Use the patch http://www.isp-control.net/forum/attachment.php?aid=548

[itanium]

Or this in the root of directory where is gui, engine, docs etc...

patch -p1< patch_dns.txt

Ps: tested in RC7 last svn and no problem.

[TXC]

possibility to change MX records would be great.

[Mister_K]

sorry im french but :

Installation :
1-
Code:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `domain_dns` (
`domain_dns_id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`domain_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`alias_id` int(11) default NULL,
`domain_dns` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
`domain_class` enum('IN','CH','HS') NOT NULL default 'IN',
`domain_type` enum('A','AAAA','CERT','CNAME','DNAME','GPOS','KEY','KX','MX','NAPTR','NSAP','NS​ ','NXT','PTR','PX','SIG','SRV','TXT') NOT NULL default 'A',
`domain_text` varchar(128) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`domain_dns_id`)
);

2- Command for use ?
http://www.isp-control.net/forum/attachment.php?aid=529


3- Patch rc7
Command for use ?
http://www.isp-control.net/forum/attachment.php?aid=548

Plz

[TXC]

2 & 3:

patch -p1< [FILENAME]


(replace [FILENAME] with filename of file you downloaded)

[Mister_K]

thx i try saturday thx

[Blondak]

(01-08-2009 03:51 AM)TXC Wrote:  possibility to change MX records would be great.

This is possible, and can be easily done, but I don't know if is it good idea, maybe I can do per user allowed record types, but there are some thinks to discuss. I think that at first we must make this "fool proof", as sci2tech wrote, that's reason why i expect some feedback, but I can add "Per User Allowed Record Types" to wishlist (i think i would be easy done, but it require update DB structure, so i'll wait).

With regards Blondak

edit: I create patch against latest patch with MX support (edit_dns.php $DNS_allowed_types)