RC6 -> RC7

[RatS]

1. Delete /etc/proftpd/ispcp/*
2. Restart proftp
3. write a ticket ... I got the same error yesterday. depends on alias-domains and is definitely a blocker

[iamgod]

just worked - thx !

[sci2tech]

Problem is generated when 2 alias domains/subdomains share same mount point. After RC7 sharing same mount point is not allowed anymore. But I`ll think what to do with old versions, when this was possible (to add aliases with same mount point)

[Claus]

(12-16-2008 03:38 AM)sci2tech Wrote:  Problem is generated when 2 alias domains/subdomains share same mount point. After RC7 sharing same mount point is not allowed anymore. But I`ll think what to do with old versions, when this was possible (to add aliases with same mount point)

Hi Scitech,

why isn't it allowed any more to share a mountpoint?

Thanx, Claus

[sci2tech]

Because that it will be duplicate content. And duplicate content is punished by search engine. Why have 2 domains showing same content? You can redirect (using htaccess) or forward (using forward option from alias edit/ add page).
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters...swer=66359
http://www.searchengineguide.com/stoney-...revent.php .
Anyway this can be discussed. So please argument.

[Lucan]

Hmm, in my opinion everybody should decide it on his own, if he uses it or not.

Often people who start a project/ website, buy "theire name" with different endings, like .de,.com,.net etc.
So it would look like:
mydomain.de
mydomain.net
mydomain.com
etc.

And because all these domains have got the same website, the feature with the aliases would be quite nice, because it would be the best and fastest solution.


Hopfefully you understand what i mean.


Greets

[sci2tech]

No I do not understand. What`s the problem with redirect (recommended way). Anyway I`ll prepare a patch, so unlock this feature. But I wont include in trunk (only if is requested by too many ). Google will not let you decide, it will punish you without asking

[Lucan]

There is no problem with redirect, it's just easier this way.
I don't need this feature anyway, but i think ispcp would be more client friendly, if somebody, who may does not have a lot of experience with all this things could easily put 2 domains on 1 website.
And if google punishs him for that, isn't realy your/my/our problem =)
So let him do it like he wants to.

[Kika]

I found a problem with backup. When i start the ispcp-backup-all than the database backup is wrong beacause the mysql password in the sql_user table didn't encrypted.

I could create backup after a little modifitation, but i think that something was wrong when i updated my system. Are there a simple way to encrypt the stored mysql passwords?

[sci2tech]

(12-16-2008 08:13 AM)Kika Wrote:  I found a problem with backup. When i start the ispcp-backup-all than the database backup is wrong beacause the mysql password in the sql_user table didn't encrypted.

I could create backup after a little modifitation, but i think that something was wrong when i updated my system. Are there a simple way to encrypt the stored mysql passwords?

I did post it somewhere but I cant find now. Save this in /var/www/ispcp/engine and run it from that folder

Code:

/var/www/ispcp/engine
perl repair_sql_user.txt

This was corrected in official RC7 package.